Tuesday, 9 April 2013

Blog 2 Problem solving

Reflective Investigator
Problem: What needs to be solved?
World hunger & poverty
World hunger and poverty, many people all over the world at the moment are dying from hunger and poverty and this problem has been around for a long time.

Context: Describe the problem space (e.g. political/cultural, usual practice, technical complexity)
Hunger and hunger related causes kill around 25,000 people every day, according to the United Nations. That means about one person dies of hunger every 3.6 seconds and they are mostly children. Poverty is linked to hunger, as people living in poverty lack money to buy enough food to keep them from starvation. As adults, if they don’t have enough food to keep healthy, then they will lose any jobs they might have had, which would lead them to even less money and food to provide for themselves also their children.
This problem has a cultural aspect to it, as world hunger has been around for a while; people in these developing countries have grown up in this life, as their parents have, and also their children if nothing changes. Our society now has a lot of fundraisers, not for profit organisations and more to help these developing countries, and a lot of us are aware that they need help. But not a lot of our culture really understands what it’s like to live in poverty and how much help they really need. Our culture takes a lot for granted, that people in developing countries would only dream of having.

Realities: Describe the practice space (e.g. public/private)
The problem of world hunger is very public; it occurs worldwide and involves a lot of the population. It is also splashed across many of a modern day media services and the internet.

Actors: Who are the key actors in the network? (E.g. positive/negative effect)
They are many actors involved in World Hunger & Poverty, hence the word ‘World’. But there are some key actors in this problem:
  • The people who live in poverty everyday
  • The government systems who govern these developing countries
  • People & Organisations who donate their money and/or time to try and fix this problem
  • United Nations agencies that are involved in reducing world hunger
The Government of these developing countries have more of a negative effect on this situation; they have these people working with pays that are not enough to keep the workers and families healthy.
Although the UN and people/organisations who donate their money & time have a positive effect on the problem.

Tensions: What are the tensions from the problem/practice space? (E.g. what stops the problem from being solved)
This problem has gone on for so long because it is so global, in 2010, 925 million people went hungry. But what stops it from being solved is that everyone in our world right now is not focused on helping the people trapped in poverty. If the problem of "world" hunger and poverty was to be fixed then the "world" would have to be on the same page about wanting to fix the situation. Every key actor of the situation would have to be focused on solving this problem, although this is much easier said than done.

Problem definition: What would the problem look like if it were solved?
If the problem of world hunger and poverty was solved, then the large number of people who die every day from hunger would be reduced significantly. Every human being on this earth would be closer to having an equal chance at life. People wouldn’t be starving to death while others have too much food to eat. Less food would be wasted and every one would be grateful to be fed.

Concepts: What possible concept might provide a solution?
A concept that I believe may provide the start of a solution is the UNICEF goal to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger. Their target by 2015 is to reduce by half the proportion of people living on less than a dollar a day and reduce by half the proportion of people who suffer from hunger. Even though this is only to reduce the amount of people who suffer from hunger, it is a good place to start. If there were more goals like this by more organisations around the world then the problem of world hunger could be solved.

References:
www.unicef.orgwww.poverty.comwww.worldhunger.org 

Sunday, 24 March 2013

New perspectives blog 3

http://michellemcalpine.wordpress.com/

After reading this blog, I realised how your mood can change how you see certain situations. Which contextual lens you wear can depend on the situation and how you feel physically and mentally at the time. Would the outcome of an event end differently if you weren't sick at the time? would you have seen more? My new perspective is that your health at the time of a incident could change the way you see the situation at the time.

New perspectives blog 2

http://atsafetyconsultancy.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/contextual-lens-of-drink-driving/

This blog has given me on a new perspective on this youtube clip. Though some young people my age may find this funny and is probably the reason behind the title of the clip, it shouldn't be viewed as a funny clip. As stated in the blog:
'The title of the clip is inappropriate, if it were to be renamed it should read “Hero Cop Saves Public From Another Bloody Idiot”."
If this person was caught by the police, he could've caused more danger to innocent drivers on the road that night or later on. The public should be viewing this clip as a warning of what could happen to you if you drink drive, maybe  instead of just crashing into a car park gutter it could be on the road and involve others beside yourself.

New perspectives blog 1



http://samanthajfarnes.blogspot.com.au/

After reading this blog, I have found a new perspective that even though you may by law cause an accident, there are a lot of fators that can lead up to the accident happening. And after the accident, peoples reactions  may be different to how you think they will react.

The World Around Us

Road crash accidents due to mobile phone use while driving.

Pregnant woman heard partner crash into tree and die as he spoke to her on mobile while driving:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2128066/Wife-heard-husbands-fatal-car-crash-mobile-phone-conversation-saw-swerve-tree.html

Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety - Queensland:
A person using a hand  held or hands free mobile while driving is FOUR times more likely to have a serious crash resulting in hospital attendance.

Police Minister Jack Dempsey:
"You only have to take your eyes off the road for a split second and it could end a life or change one forever." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2128066/Wife-heard-husbands-fatal-car-crash-mobile-phone-conversation-saw-swerve-tree.html

Research shows mobile phone use and other distractions were responsible for more than a third of fatal car crashes in Queensland in 2011 - 2012 financial year. http://www.police.qld.gov.au/Resources/Internet/news%20and%20alerts/campaigns/fatalfive/documents/mobile_phones_and_distraction_fs.pdf


Using mobile phones whist driving is something many drivers do, and is a on going cause of accidents all over the world. Drivers only have to be distracted by a mobile phone for a second and could cause an accident.
Contextual lens:

Key actors in these accidents would include:
-The Driver using the mobile phone
-The person/people the driver is talking to
-The Emergency Services that respond to the accident
-The Public who witness the accident or see it on the news


The driver of the car who uses the mobile phone:
May not realise the danger of what they are doing while they are using the phone (uneducated)
They could know of the danger but think it won't happen to them, believe that they can use the mobile as they are a good driver
Think they can still use a mobile as long as the police don't catch them

The person/people the driver is talking to:
May not realise they are driving, therefore cannot warn them of the danger
Know they are driving, but believe they are a good driver and keep talking
Not know of the dangers relating to driving and mobile phone distraction

The emergency services that respond to the accident:
All emergency services know very well that using mobile phones while driving can cause accidents
Police can charge the driver for using a mobile phone while driving
Some ermergency service personell may believe they can use a mobile phone while driving as they have full knowledge of what can happen

The public who witness the accident or see it on the news:
Understand the danger of using a mobile phone while driving and not do it whilst they are driving
Take no notice to the accident and believe it won't happen to them
Feel really moved by the accident and stop using their phone while driving


While wearing these lense it may influence how this situation is perceived by various parties, as some parties might see using a phone whilst driving dangerous and not use their phones. Although the drivers who use their phones put themselves and everyone aroud them in danger and they think its ok. Also the person on the other side of the phone may see driving whist on the phone is ok.

These factors may influence the outcomes of the events as different people wear different lens, some my think its ok to use a phone whilst driving and others may not. Ultimately this factor can change the outcome of many accidents caused on our roads due to mobile phones.

Thursday, 21 March 2013

Mind Map

Well this is my mind map on a simple task: Straightening Hair